13:38:12	 From Steen Bender : i hope they had computeres to count those rings...
13:44:05	 From N A Norman Pedersen : Could you elaborate on that calibration conclusion ?
13:48:34	 From Steen Bender : can you repeat what happened at the calibration example from before
13:50:40	 From Peter Andresen : Is It still the same variable we measure_ 
13:50:43	 From Peter Andresen : _
13:50:45	 From Kasper Hede Nielsen : Is it now x calib on the x axis on the rigth plot?
13:50:48	 From Steen Bender : Okay, so there are no rule of thumb for calibration, it depents on what we want / have to see
13:51:17	 From Peter Andresen : Is it still the same variable we measure?
13:51:40	 From Peter Andresen : Would the conclusion be the same if we found a peak in x-measured nand in x-calib?
13:52:40	 From Steen Bender : Is it residual you have in the 2D plot then? 
13:52:41	 From Peter Andresen : But somehow you are now measuring the variable you measure, but minus some other value (Y)?
13:53:05	 From David : do i understand it correctly, that we obtain the -40(Y-0.5) by "guestimating" it from the hist_xy figure?
13:53:07	 From Markus : How would you go about fitting to a line in the 2d plot?
13:53:16	 From Liam Ward : How do you know you are measuring X = 100 for calibration?
13:54:10	 From Peter Andresen : Alright, thanks!