Applied Statistics - Project 1
Project description:
It is the year 1679, and Hooke is (following a suggestion from Newton)
trying to prove the rotation of Earth by the Coriolis force on falling
bodies. Your team has an other (better?) idea, namely to measure the
gravitational pull on Earth at different latitudes.
However, to obtain the necessary funding to travel south and repeat a
measurement of g near equator, you have to prove that you can do it
with the necessary precision. The size of the effect is somewhere
around 0.5%, and you want to prove the difference with 5 sigma
certainty, which thus requires sub-per-mille precision.
Your mission - and you have little choice, but to accept it - is to
take up the challenge of making these measurements and proving that at
least one of your two experimental setups has the required/desired
precision...
Left: Robert Hooke (1655-1705),
Right: The distribution of land and ocean, if Earth's rotation
stopped!
Experiments:
Experiment 1: Ball rolling down an incline (or dropping freely)
Experiment 2: Simple pendulum with a mass at the end
Suggestions for initial macros:
The following two macros are suggestions for a place to start data analysis. They
run on the datasets provided, which should look a bit what you have!
Rolling Ball:
RollingBall_Fys2Lab_FitData.py,
data_RollingBall_V1.txt
Pendulum:
g_Pendulum.py
For the pendulum experiment, I suggest copying this analysis macro,
and "empty" it. Also, for illustrating the period measurement, you may
let yourself be inspired by
the
following plot macro snippet (i.e. piece of code that does NOT run
by itself!), which produces
this figure.
Writing up results:
The project should be written in Physical Review Letter style (or
something close to it, if you don't like Latex) thus not more than
3-4 pages! The aim should be to answer the questions on page two of
the
introduction slides.
You do not need to describe the experiments themselves (assume the
reader is a fellow student, who has also done the experiments), but of
course all measurements, details and results should be described, such
that the reader can follow (i.e. calculate themselves) your results
fully and reproduce what you have done.
Below you can find the files needed (works with pdftex as well, except
for the figures, which needs to be converted into .pdf or .png):
PRL Latex template.
Test figure.
Result using current template.
For each of the two results, I would like to see a table with the
errors from each of the variables listed. So for each variable used
in determining g, list their value, their uncertainty, and their
impact on g (i.e. if they were the only uncertainty on g, how large
would it then be), so that one can compare source of error. An
example in LaTeX can be found in the PRL template above.
Notes:
For measuring time to (better than) 1/100 of a second with lap time
and the option of saving the result to a file on your computer, please
use the following Python stop watch script:
stopwatch.py.
Comments:
Enjoy, have fun, and throw yourself boldly at the data.
Post Project Follow up:
A review of the experiments and the project results can be found here:
LabProjectReview2014.pdf.
Last updated: 31st of September 2014.