08:22:41	 From Marcus Nørgaard Weng : It makes sense now:)
08:28:07	 From svend korsgaard : after all, everytime we solve the schrødinger equation, we are actually solving for a PDF right?
08:28:15	 From Marcus Nørgaard Weng : So are there some intrinsic properties in different physical systems which make them produce some specific pdf on their measurements?
08:31:50	 From Marta Mrozowska : just in terms of notation, we will always use mu and sigma for the "ideal" or "underlying" distributions, and x_bar and s_hat for measured distributions?
08:42:30	 From Silvia : How do we assess when N is big enough to use the Poisson formula? 
08:46:35	 From Steen Bender : will the sum still be one then?
08:47:07	 From Steen Bender : also if you add to poisson?
08:47:40	 From Steen Bender : cool thanks 
08:48:19	 From svend korsgaard : like between 3 and 10?
08:48:19	 From Victor von Wachter : 300 worldwide
08:48:19	 From Jonas la Cour : 1/10^6 ? 
08:48:20	 From Marcus Nørgaard Weng : 0 
08:48:20	 From Marta Mrozowska : people or planes?
08:48:20	 From Steen Bender : between 1 and 10000
08:48:26	 From Marta Mrozowska : 10
08:48:28	 From Jaime Caballer : 150
08:48:30	 From Marcus Winther Dreisler : 1
08:48:30	 From Katriona Gould : 1 or less
08:48:32	 From Jeppe Karnøe Knudsen : 5
08:48:32	 From Marcus Nørgaard Weng : 0 most years
08:48:32	 From Andreas Mosgaard Jørgensen : 3
08:48:32	 From Steen Bender : pi^2
08:48:32	 From Kiril : 5
08:48:32	 From svend korsgaard : 6
08:48:33	 From Jakob kruse : 31
08:48:34	 From Victor von Wachter : 5 planes
08:48:34	 From Pablo Alberdi- Pagola : 5
08:48:34	 From jmlin : 100
08:48:34	 From Qinyi Chen : 5
08:48:35	 From Magnus : 5
08:48:35	 From Kristine Marie Løfgren Krighaar : 5
08:48:35	 From Thor : 3
08:48:35	 From David : 2
08:48:35	 From Jens Edelvang-Pejrup : 3
08:48:36	 From Bia Fonseca : 1 or less
08:48:36	 From Aske Luja Lehmann Rosted : 100
08:48:36	 From Norman Pedersen : 0.5
08:48:38	 From Nikos Giannoulis : 7
08:48:38	 From Camilla : 10
08:48:40	 From Leon Bozianu : 4
08:48:41	 From xiangyin tan : 0.01
08:48:52	 From Aske Luja Lehmann Rosted : small airplanes included?
08:49:15	 From svend korsgaard : So fear of flying is irratioanl?
08:49:50	 From svend korsgaard : can you repeat the question?
08:50:06	 From Marta Mrozowska : no because the co2 emissions have a long term effect on your life ;)
08:50:32	 From Aske Luja Lehmann Rosted : stop binning in years?
08:53:10	 From jmlin : so if the mechanism is changed, so the distribution could be changed ?
08:53:40	 From Nikolay Georgiev : In the airplane example: wouldn’t you look at the historical data spread, not the sqr root of an average?
08:54:39	 From svend korsgaard : I just don´t understand how a symmetric distribution (Binomial) can reduce to a distribution that is not symmetric (Poisson)
08:56:54	 From Jakob : What about the assumptions underlying the distribution like constant rate and the outcomes not being independent. 
Are these assumptions that one makes and that work in most cases? 
09:02:33	 From Nikolay Georgiev : In practice, wouldn’t we use Student’s most of the time? How often do we know really know the true variance?
09:05:17	 From Jakob : I will post mine again: 
What about the assumptions underlying the poisson distribution like constant rate and the outcomes not being independent. 
Are these assumptions that one makes and that work in most cases? 
09:05:23	 From Jonas la Cour : So the rationale for Poisson was the computation of factorials what's the motivation for gaussian instead of Poisson ?
09:06:39	 From Jonas la Cour : Fair